What now for the new Whistleblower Protection Directve?
On Tuesday it was all about the euphoria of the whistleblower protection Directive being adopted by the European Parliament (EP) in Strasbourg. Now the hard work begins again, as politicians, trade unions, NGOs and whistleblowers meet to discuss; “The future of the new [whistleblower protection] Directive”.
EP votes for the whistleblower protection Directive by a large majority
The historic moment, when the EP voted for the whistleblower protection Directive by a large majority, has rightfully been heralded as, ‘one of the greatest successes of this European Parliament’s mandate’. But it is what happens now, in terms of individual Member State transposition of the Directive, which will determine the effectiveness of this legislation.
One of the greatest successes of this European Parliament’s mandate
A few procedural steps remain before the legislation comes into force, tentatively early autumn. The EP has established that whistleblowers the from all EU member states will now be legally protected when they speak out against corruption and wrong doing in general. But it is how those countries adopt and interpret the legislation, which will provide the key. The civil society event not only celebrated the adoption of the new Directive, it also sought to chart a course for its future at Member State level.
The future of the new Directive?
Opening the civil society event, Virginie Rozière, the EP’s Rapporteur on Europe’s whistleblower protection, noted that the passing of the Directive, by such a large majority of MEPs, reflected the work done collectively by civil society, journalists as well as politicians, ‘who provided a strong foundation for what has been achieved’.
Pascal Durand MEP told attendees that civil society played a crucial role in persuading reluctant Member States of the need for a European dimension to whistleblower protection. It is hoped that these networks will remain active in terms of ensuring that Member State transposition is as effective as possible.
Deltour expressed concern that Member States may be reluctant to go beyond the material scope, covering EU competencies.
Antoine Deltour, the LuxLeaks whistleblower, speaking at the event, said suspicion of whistleblowers has diminished in recent years, as the general public now have a better understanding that whistleblowing is in the public interest, which he said helped civil society mobilise in support of the EU Directive. However, Deltour expressed concern that Member States may be reluctant to go beyond the material scope, covering EU competencies, when it comes to implementing the Directive. He feels that the legal status of whistleblowers who gather and distribute ‘secret information’ needs to be clarified in transposition, as they remain vulnerable in many European countries.
Now the hard work begins
Transparency International EU’s Senior Policy Officer Nick Aiossa continued on the theme of transposition. He said that for his organisation the hard work was just beginning, in that the minimum standards set out in the Directive, should be raised in transposition process. According to Aiossa, Member States should incorporate higher whistleblower protection standards into national legislation. He also talked of the need to increase protection for whistleblowers working in EU institutions.
Member States should incorporate higher whistleblower protection standards into national legislation.
Martin Jefflén President of Eurocadres stated that ‘transposition needs to fill in the gaps’, still present in the Directive, with the limitations of material scope being one of the problematic areas. Jefflén also said that trade unions will continue to fight for the rights of whistleblowers around the protection of workers, in terms of health and safety standards, for example. According to the Eurocadres President there is room for whistleblower protection to improve in the 10 countries, which already have national whistleblowers protection legislation and this will be part of the ongoing battle in the upcoming transposition process.
The national transposition of the Directive
The Executive Director of Whistleblowing International Network (WIN), Anna Myers talked of being energised by the EP’s vote approving the whistleblower protection Directive, but she also noted that ‘a lot of hard work still needs to be done at the Member State level, as a number of EU governments are showing a reluctance to fully implement the new Directive. While other Member States are indicating that they will deliberately look to minimise the level of protection, their citizens have.
WIN will be working with its members, associates and coalition partners to ensure the national transposition of the Directive, which must be completed by 2021, results in even stronger and more progressive laws to protect whistleblowers.
The worrying trend of governments privatising information, in terms of criminalising whistleblowers gathering and sharing ‘secret documents.
Myers also pointed to the worrying trend of governments privatising information, in terms of criminalising whistleblowers gathering and sharing ‘secret documents’ which they believe come under the public right to know. She hopes the transposition process will strengthen the notion, that when whistleblowers come forward that they will know that they are fully legally protected, that they will be listened to, that action will be taken and that civil society, journalists and politicians will stand by them, when the information they reveal exposes corruption and wrong doing.
So as the celebrations surrounding the European Parliament’s approval of the whistleblower protection Directive subside, it is clear that the whistleblower protection platform will be needed more than ever, as the battles over Member State transposition begins.
MEP Virginie Rozière, European Parliament Rapporteur for the proposed whistleblower protection directive, yesterday, received petitions with more than 280,000 signatures, gathered by coalitions of trade unions and NGOs, which she handed over to the Council of the European Union at the final scheduled trilogue in the Parliament on Monday 4 March.
Today trade unions and NGOs will deliver two petitions gathering over 280,000 signatures supporting the European Parliament’s demands for an improved directive.
In an open letter to the European Council, Commission and Parliament seven well-known European whistleblowers speak out for changing the directive and removing barriers for safe reporting.
The EU Whistleblowing Directive is an idea whose time has come. New whistleblower protection laws in Ireland, France and the Netherlands showed consensus was building among EU Member States on the need to protect and enable workers to speak up about wrongdoing in the workplace.
The directive must be changed to that whistleblowers can report not only a special internal whistleblowing channel, but also to managers or law enforcement.
In an open letter 81 signing organisations urge the EU Council to adopt the Parliament’s position on reporting channels. The whistleblower protection directive is currently in trilogue. The signatories express serious concerns about the reporting channels regime in the Council and Commission positions in these negotiations.
A few weeks left to improve the whistleblower protection directive. Make your voice heard and sign the new petition for strong whistleblower protection!
The Romanian Presidency will play a key role is securing a robust whistleblower protection Directive, argues R. Nicolae, of Syene. He believes that Romania has a number of strengths which will support it leading the negotiations, as the whistleblower protection file moves from the Council to trilogue.
According to the Legal Counsel of the Danske Bank Whistleblower, S. Kohn, the Howard Wilkinson case clearly demonstrates that the EU Whistleblower Directive urgently needs to be revised to protect the right to report directly to law enforcement agencies and regulatory authorities.
The Duty Speech Loophole: how the EU Whistleblower Directive could backfire against its own objectives
Tom Devine, Legal Director of GAP explains why a series of technical contradictions within the EU draft directive need to be resolved, or the legislation could backfire and actually work against whistleblowers.