Significantly stronger Whistleblower Directive clears crucial EP hurdle
The recent vote by the European Parliament’s Legal Affairs Committee, JURI, is primarily a cause for celebration for all European’s who wish for a more transparent and open Europe.
The Committee adopted its report on the whistleblower protection directive on the 20th of November. The report has been largely welcomed as introducing texts more robust and more supportive of those reporting crimes and wrongdoing, than the original European Commission proposal. The Directive is currently under scrutiny by the Council, the EU Member States. WhistleblowerProtection.EU platform members, while celebrating this victory, knows the hard work begins again, in terms of getting the legislation approved by Council and to stand the test of the trilogue, the negotiations between the European Parliament, Council and Commission.
the hard work begins again, in terms of getting the legislation approved by Council and to stand the test of the trilogue
Commenting on this crucial parliamentary vote, Martin Jefflén, President of Eurocadres, noted: ‘This is an important milestone in the process to obtain a legislation which we desperately need to strengthen democracy, transparency and workers’ rights. Clearly the parliament has improved the proposal on many important points, such as adding the right to report on the abuses of workers’ rights, supporting anonymous reporting and stronger rights to report to media and the public.
Nicholas Aiossa, Policy Officer at Transparency International EU, and a major contributor to the work of the platform, reflecting on events in the European Parliament said: ‘It is disgraceful that whistleblowers continue to face potential retaliation for exposing corrupt practices. The European Parliament has rightly sought to strengthen protection for those who speak out against wrongdoing across the EU. Now it will be up to the Council to continue in this positive direction’.
The European Parliament has rightly sought to strengthen protection for those who speak out against wrongdoing across the EU
Ricardo Gutiérrez, General Secretary of EFJ, welcomed the decision of JURI Committee to extend the scope of proposed legislation to working conditions, public health and safety, and to strengthen the role of trade unions. He also welcomed the efforts to guarantee robust protection to those choosing to turn directly to the media to report unlawful or wrongful acts.
Although this legislation covers Europe, there has been a determined international effort which helped achieve this week’s success at the European Parliament. Tom Devine, Legal Director of Government Accountability Project, based in Washington DC, recently visited Brussels to offer counsel and guidance to those lobbying for a better directive. His team also developed important legal guidelines, giving detailed suggestions on improving the Commission’s original proposal.
Devine welcomed the JURI vote, saying: ‘The European Union Whistleblower Directive voted out of committee, on Tuesday, would set the global standard for best practice rights protecting freedom of speech where it counts the most—challenging abuses of power that betray the public trust. If approved, this will be a landmark paradigm shift protecting freedom of speech and give whistleblowers a meaningful voice to make a difference. The new rights would ban direct or indirect retaliation against all current or former, public or private workers and volunteers who blow the whistle, as well as those who assist them including Civil Society Organizations and media that report on their evidence. The new Directive is far stronger than U.S. whistleblower rights.’
The new Directive is far stronger than U.S. whistleblower rights.
EPSU’s General Secretary, Jan Willem Goudriaan, sees the importance of Tuesday’s vote in terms of, ‘the many workers who feel the urge to speak out for the public good but are not free to do so’. He believes that after years of austerity, EU-wide protection is particularly important in public services. ‘We have recent examples where workers in the elderly care sector reported wrongdoing and malpractice over hygiene and food for residents to management,’ continues Goudriaan, ‘caused by lack of funding. They were ignored at best or fired at worst. This is why safe external and public channels must be made available to them, with the support of the trade unions. We urge EU governments to support improvements. Ahead of the EP elections in May, more democracy and transparency at work and in our institutions is what we need.’
We urge EU governments to support improvements.
And so now the work goes on, as the legislation moves to Council. Jefflén notes: ‘The Whistleblower platform, will be extremely useful as we continue to both share information and coordinate our work as we direct our attention to the governments of the EU Member States’.
The directive must be changed to that whistleblowers can report not only a special internal whistleblowing channel, but also to managers or law enforcement.
In an open letter 81 signing organisations urge the EU Council to adopt the Parliament’s position on reporting channels. The whistleblower protection directive is currently in trilogue. The signatories express serious concerns about the reporting channels regime in the Council and Commission positions in these negotiations.
A few weeks left to improve the whistleblower protection directive. Make your voice heard and sign the new petition for strong whistleblower protection!
The Romanian Presidency will play a key role is securing a robust whistleblower protection Directive, argues R. Nicolae, of Syene. He believes that Romania has a number of strengths which will support it leading the negotiations, as the whistleblower protection file moves from the Council to trilogue.
According to the Legal Counsel of the Danske Bank Whistleblower, S. Kohn, the Howard Wilkinson case clearly demonstrates that the EU Whistleblower Directive urgently needs to be revised to protect the right to report directly to law enforcement agencies and regulatory authorities.
The Duty Speech Loophole: how the EU Whistleblower Directive could backfire against its own objectives
Tom Devine, Legal Director of GAP explains why a series of technical contradictions within the EU draft directive need to be resolved, or the legislation could backfire and actually work against whistleblowers.
Council legal opinion must not be used to delay completion of whistleblower protection legislation
/ Blog The European Council must ensure EU delivers on its promise to whistleblowers The European Council has a responsibility to protect…
European institutions have been seen as being too close to lobbyists and vested interests. It would be a real shame if member states’ representatives were now seen as acting against public concerns, in resisting a whistleblower protection law which encourages the reporting of crime and wrongdoing, said Virginie Rozière MEP.