Will the EU Whistleblower Directive prohibit the obstruction of justice?

The European Union is currently debating a whistleblower directive designed to protect citizens who report criminal frauds, threats to the environment and other violations of law. One of the most important issues now before EU Council is whether or not to protect employees who make initial reports directly to regulatory authorities or law enforcement agencies.


January 24, 2019Blog

Stephen M. Kohn; Legal Counsel to Danske Bank whistleblower Howard Wilkinson

The Howard Wilkinson whistleblower case, with which I am closely involved with, clearly demonstrates the urgent need for an EU-wide whistleblower directive to protect the right to report potential violations directly to law enforcement agencies and regulatory authorities. In Mr. Wilkinson’s case Denmark lacked any protections for employees who report criminal violations to regulatory or law enforcement agencies.  Thus, Mr. Wilkinson could have been subjected to retaliation, with no remedy in law, if he disclosed the massive money laundering scheme he uncovered to the Danish police, regulatory agencies or even the Danish Parliament.

TAX3 committee - Public hearing on Combatting money laundering in the EU banking sectorUnquestionably, the lack of whistleblower protections resulted in a long delay in capturing the criminals responsible for the illegal money laundering identified by Mr. Wilkinson.  In fact, this delay most likely will result in the failure to track down most of the criminal assets, associated with the case.

It is absolutely essential that the EU whistleblower directive follows the precedents set in U.S. law.

Denmark is not unique in failing to protect the basic right of citizens to report crimes to appropriate authorities. I believe it is absolutely essential that the EU whistleblower directive follows the precedents set in U.S. law, and ensures that direct reports to governmental agencies are fully protected.  Any restriction on the right of citizens or employees to report crimes to law enforcement or other appropriate authorities would be counter to the basic tenants of democracy, would undermine the rule of law, and would constitute an obstruction of justice.

The European Commission’s initial proposal stated that employees should be required to report violations of law to their bosses, before they can report these violations to appropriate government authorities or law enforcement agencies.  Any such requirement would, under well-established legal principles, constitute an obstruction of justice and violate core democratic principles.

A fundamental principle in whistleblower law is the protection of employees who disclose criminal violations to responsible law enforcement officials.

A fundamental principle in whistleblower law is the protection of employees who disclose criminal violations to responsible law enforcement officials.  Nothing is more basic.  Any interference with this right is an obstruction of justice and cannot be supported under any circumstance.

Common sense dictates that reports directly to government officials must be protected.

Common sense dictates that reports directly to government officials must be protected. For example, if you are looking out of your window, see a young offender mugging, you do not call the young person’s parent.  You call the police.  The same goes for corporate crime.  If a company is stealing from its investors, or engaging in money laundering, illegal secret banking or other offenses, it is clearly important to report these crimes directly to the police as quickly as possible.

The EU whistleblower directive and the precedent of US law

Every U.S. whistleblower law protects the right of employees to directly report violations of law to the government.  As recently explained by the U.S. Supreme Court, in a case under the Dodd-Frank/Securities and Exchange Act:  “The ‘core objective’ of Dodd-Frank’s robust whistleblower program . . . is ‘to motivate people who know of securities law violations to tell the SEC [U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission]’ By enlisting whistleblowers to ‘assist the Government [in] identify[ing] and prosecut[ing] persons who have violated securities laws,’ Congress undertook to improve SEC enforcement.”

In this case the Supreme Court went so far as to hold that internal reporting was not protected whistleblowing, and in order to be a whistleblower covered under the Dodd-Frank Act an employee was required to report violations to the government.

The proposed EU whistleblower directive should not undermine the ability of whistleblowers to remain confidential, throughout the reporting process.

Most U.S. whistleblower laws permit employees to choose whether to report internally or report directly to the government.  See The New Whistleblower’s Handbook, Rule 15.  However, no U.S. anti-retaliation law requires that employees file their reports directly to their employer in order to obtain protection.

It is extremely important that the EU does not pass legislation that limits whistleblowers rights to report firstly report appropriate authorities or law enforcement agencies. The proposed EU whistleblower directive should not undermine the ability of whistleblowers to remain confidential, throughout the reporting process, as this creates the opportunity to intimidate witnesses and may tip criminals off to the evidence against them. The EU has a unique opportunity to build on best practice and create a supportive and robust whistleblowers protection legal framework.  It is essential that it does not lose its way.


Share it

Steve Kohn Danske Bank WB Counsel 24 Jan 19 v3 3D Paint

About the author

Stephen M. Kohn represents Danske Bank whistleblower Howard Wilkinson.  He is a partner in the qui tam/whistleblower rights law firm of Kohn, Kohn and Colapinto, and serves, pro bono, as the Executive Director of the National Whistleblower Center.  Mr. Kohn has represented whistleblowers since 1984 and won the largest bank fraud whistleblower case in history, obtaining a $104 million whistleblower reward for his client.


Be prepared for transposition

By Martin Jefflen | July 5, 2019

The official adoption of the whistleblower directive is foreseen for the autumn. The directive protects persons who report in a work-related context inboth the private and public sector.

What now for the new Whistleblower Protection Directive?

By Martin Todd | April 18, 2019

On Tuesday it was all about the euphoria of the whistleblower protection Directive being adopted by the European Parliament (EP) in Strasbourg. Now the hard work begins again, as politicians, trade unions, NGOs and whistleblowers meet to discuss; “The future of the new [whistleblower protection] Directive”, at a civil society event at the European Parliament, on the 17th of April.

The future of the new whistleblower directive

By Janina Mackiewicz | April 15, 2019

In the final session before the EU elections, the European Parliament will vote for a new EU Directive to protect whistleblowers in Europe. Civil society played an essential role in making this happen.

JURI unanimously accepts trilogue’s whistleblower protection deal

By Martin Todd | March 18, 2019

Warm applause greeted the unanimous adoption of last week’s trilogue provisional agreement on whistleblower protection, at today’s European Parliament Legal Affairs Committee.

Whistleblower Protection platform largely welcomes EU agreement

By Martin Todd | March 13, 2019

Members of the WhistleblowersProtection.EU platform mainly welcomed the provisional agreement reached by the European Parliament, the Commission and the Council, in the early hours of the 12th of March.

EU whistleblower directive must give whistleblowers all reporting options

By Nadja Salson | March 7, 2019

The European Union is expected to shortly adopt the EU’s flagship whistleblower protection directive. EPSU, believes it is essential that the final legislation fully protects whistleblowers and encourages whistleblowers to report wrongdoing, through which ever route they consider most appropriate, be that the media or relevant authorities.

Handover of 280,000 petition signatures calling for a better directive

By Martin Todd | March 5, 2019

MEP Virginie Rozière, European Parliament Rapporteur for the proposed whistleblower protection directive, yesterday, received petitions with more than 280,000 signatures, gathered by coalitions of trade unions and NGOs, which she handed over to the Council of the European Union at the final scheduled trilogue in the Parliament on Monday 4 March.

Over a quarter of a million signatories support better whistleblower protection

By Martin Todd | March 4, 2019

Today trade unions and NGOs will deliver two petitions gathering over 280,000 signatures supporting the European Parliament’s demands for an improved directive.

European whistleblowers call for better directive

By Martin Jefflen | February 25, 2019

In an open letter to the European Council, Commission and Parliament seven well-known European whistleblowers speak out for changing the directive and removing barriers for safe reporting.

Whistleblowers could be badly served by the EU’s proposed Whistleblowing Directive

By John Devitt | February 25, 2019

The EU Whistleblowing Directive is an idea whose time has come. New whistleblower protection laws in Ireland, France and the Netherlands showed consensus was building among EU Member States on the need to protect and enable workers to speak up about wrongdoing in the workplace.