Handover of 280,000 petition signatures calling for a better directive
MEP Virginie Rozière, European Parliament Rapporteur for the proposed whistleblower protection directive, yesterday, received petitions with more than 280,000 signatures, gathered by a coalition of trade unions and NGOs, which she handed over to the Council of the European Union at the final scheduled trilogue in the Parliament on Monday 4 March.
The petitions by Eurocadres, WeMove.EU, Blueprint for Free Speech, FIBGAR and Riparte il Futuro, express European citizens demands for an improved directive to better protect whistleblowers. They also underline that the legislation should allow whistleblowers to firstly report criminal activity and wrongdoing, through the channel, which they find appropriate and are comfortable with, be that to regulatory authorities, law enforcement agencies or the media.
If you report directly to your line manager you could lose your whistleblower protection.
Currently, the proposed whistleblower protection directive states that you are obliged to first report to your organisation’s special internal whistleblowing channel. This contains the danger that if you report directly to your line manager you could lose your whistleblower protection. Campaigners and the petitioners agree with the Parliament in that this requirement should be removed from the directive.
The legislation should allow whistleblowers to firstly report criminal activity and wrongdoing, through the channel, which they find appropriate and are comfortable with.
The petitions which were handed over at the European Parliament, also confirm that the European public wants a directive which includes the right to seek advice from trade unions and NGOs and the possibility to be represented by trade unions.
Petitioners also demand whistleblowers should be fully protected when they report to journalists, this would encourage investigative journalism. There is also a strong belief that a ‘non-regression’ clause needs to be added to the directive. Such a clause would aim at ensuring that the directive cannot be used to worsen existing whistleblower protection laws in Member States.
There is also a strong belief that a ‘non-regression’ clause needs to be added to the directive.
The trilogue will continue next week, an extension beyond the original timetable, making an agreement possible next week, at the earliest. For the legislative process to be finalised before the parliamentary elections an agreement must be made very shortly between the Parliament, Commission and Council. Those working to improve the directive will therefore focus much of their work on last minute advocacy efforts to give a last push for these necessary changes to the whistleblower protection directive.
The European Council has a responsibility to protect the positive amendments made to the proposal for a whistleblower protection directive adopted by the European Parliament’s legal affairs committee last month.
It would be a real shame if member states’ representatives were now seen as acting against public concerns, in resisting a whistleblower protection law which encourages the reporting of crime and wrongdoing.
The now famous Danske Bank Whistleblower, Howard Wilkinson, testified before the TAX3 European Parliament Committee last week. Wilkinson reported suspicious financial transactions at Danske Bank’s Estonia branch, where he worked until 2014.
The WhistleblowerProtection.EU platform is celebrating a job well done, after the Legal Affairs Committee of the European Parliament passed a strengthened whistleblower protection directive, on the 20th of November.
The EU’s whistleblower protection directive, is in a state of flux, key political battles are being fought right now. The whistleblower proposals as they currently stand, have several Achilles heels tucked into the directive’s fine print.
The LuxLeaks revelations were unprecedented not only in the level of corruption they uncovered, but also in the vast array of journalists from different media organisations working together to uncover corruption.
Many of the biggest whistleblower disclosures of recent years have been international in nature – LuxLeaks and the Panama Papers in particular. As pointed out by the Greens in the European Parliament, there is a general European public interest that often supersedes the national interests of a single member state.
Protection for whistleblowers in Europe is currently a patchwork affair. Some countries, such as Ireland having robust laws in place, while others, such as Cyprus, have practically none. 16 EU member states have specific laws or provisions, and 10 of those adopted their laws or in the past 5 years.